Ai Coding Tools

Bolt.new vs GitHub Copilot: Which AI Coding Tool is Worth Your Time?

By BTW Team3 min read

Bolt.new vs GitHub Copilot: Which AI Coding Tool is Worth Your Time?

In 2026, the landscape of AI coding tools has expanded, making it challenging for indie hackers and solo founders to choose the right one. With the rise of tools like Bolt.new and GitHub Copilot, many builders are left wondering which AI-powered assistant will actually save them time and enhance their coding experience. After testing both extensively, I’m here to break down the key differences, pricing, and real-world applications to help you decide.

What Does Each Tool Do?

Bolt.new

Bolt.new is an AI coding assistant designed to help developers write code faster by generating snippets and offering contextual suggestions based on the developer's existing code. It aims to be more intuitive and user-friendly than traditional coding assistants.

  • Pricing: Free tier + $10/mo for Pro features
  • Best for: Indie developers looking for a straightforward tool to streamline their coding process.
  • Limitations: Limited language support compared to other tools; struggles with complex algorithms.
  • Our take: We use Bolt.new for quick prototyping, but it falls short for more complex projects.

GitHub Copilot

GitHub Copilot, developed by GitHub in collaboration with OpenAI, leverages machine learning to suggest entire lines or blocks of code based on the context of what you're writing. It's integrated directly into your editor, making it easy to use while coding.

  • Pricing: $10/mo per user, no free tier
  • Best for: Developers working on larger projects or who need more comprehensive coding assistance.
  • Limitations: Can produce incorrect or insecure code; requires a bit of oversight.
  • Our take: We find Copilot invaluable for tackling repetitive coding tasks, but it can lead to bad practices if not monitored closely.

Feature Comparison

| Feature | Bolt.new | GitHub Copilot | |--------------------------|------------------------------|------------------------------| | Code Suggestions | Contextual snippets | Full line/block suggestions | | Language Support | Limited (JavaScript, Python) | Extensive (multiple languages) | | Integration | Editor plugins available | Direct integration with VS Code and others | | Learning Curve | Easy to pick up | Moderate; may require adjustments | | Pricing | Free tier + $10/mo Pro | $10/mo per user | | Ideal Use Case | Quick prototyping | Larger, complex projects |

Decision Framework: Choose Based on Your Needs

  • Choose Bolt.new if:

    • You're an indie developer focused on rapid prototyping.
    • You prefer a tool that’s easy to integrate without a steep learning curve.
    • You need a budget-friendly option.
  • Choose GitHub Copilot if:

    • You’re working on larger codebases or projects that require more robust coding assistance.
    • You want a tool that adapts to various programming languages and frameworks.
    • You’re willing to invest a little more for a comprehensive solution.

Real-World Applications and Experiences

In our experience, both tools have their place, but they cater to different user needs. Bolt.new excels in quick tasks, like generating simple functions or boilerplate code. However, when we tackled a larger project involving multiple languages and complex integrations, GitHub Copilot proved to be the superior choice, significantly speeding up our workflow.

What We Actually Use

While we sometimes rely on both tools, GitHub Copilot has become our go-to for serious projects due to its extensive feature set and adaptability. On the other hand, we find ourselves reaching for Bolt.new when we need quick solutions or are just starting a new project.

Conclusion: Start Here

If you're just beginning your journey into AI coding tools, I recommend starting with Bolt.new to get a feel for AI-assisted coding without upfront costs. Once you're comfortable and ready to tackle more complex projects, consider investing in GitHub Copilot for its advanced capabilities.

Ultimately, the right tool for you depends on your specific needs, budget, and the complexity of your projects. Choose wisely, and happy coding!

Follow Our Building Journey

Weekly podcast episodes on tools we're testing, products we're shipping, and lessons from building in public.

Subscribe

Never miss an episode

Subscribe to Built This Week for weekly insights on AI tools, product building, and startup lessons from Ryz Labs.

Subscribe
Ai Coding Tools

How to Automate Code Review with AI in 20 Minutes

How to Automate Code Review with AI in 20 Minutes If you've ever spent hours sifting through pull requests, you know how tedious code reviews can be. As indie hackers and solo foun

Feb 11, 20264 min read
Ai Coding Tools

Supabase vs Firebase: Best AI-Powered Databases in 2026

Supabase vs Firebase: Best AIPowered Databases in 2026 Choosing the right database for your project can feel like navigating a maze. As indie hackers and solo founders, we often fi

Feb 11, 20263 min read
Ai Coding Tools

Why Most Developers Overlook the Power of AI in Coding

Why Most Developers Overlook the Power of AI in Coding In 2026, the coding landscape is rapidly evolving, yet many developers still hesitate to fully embrace AI coding tools. Why?

Feb 11, 20264 min read
Ai Coding Tools

Best 8 AI Coding Tools for Beginners: 2026 Edition

Best 8 AI Coding Tools for Beginners: 2026 Edition As a beginner in coding, finding the right tools can feel like searching for a needle in a haystack. With so many options out the

Feb 11, 20265 min read
Ai Coding Tools

5 Common Mistakes Everyone Makes with AI Coding Tools

5 Common Mistakes Everyone Makes with AI Coding Tools In 2026, AI coding tools are everywhere, promising to make our lives easier as developers. But as someone who’s dabbled in var

Feb 11, 20264 min read
Ai Coding Tools

Cursor vs GitHub Copilot: Comparing AI Coding Giants in 2026

Cursor vs GitHub Copilot: Comparing AI Coding Giants in 2026 As builders in 2026, we're constantly bombarded with the promise of AI tools that can enhance our coding efficiency. Cu

Feb 11, 20263 min read